![]() ![]() The Ark of The Covenant Has Been Finally Discovered! By Walid Shoebat (Shoebat Exclusive)I discovered where the Ark of the Covenant is, but as soon as I explain it and its secret location, none of my friends will even care. For man seeks the literal gold while he forgets the spiritual gems. For years I was an enthusiast searching for the Ark of the Covenant, was it in Aksum Ethiopia? Or was it hidden under the Temple Mount? For years, the debates went back and forth over the whereabouts of the Ark but when one runs into certain verses, it should give us pause to think: “It shall be in those days when you are multiplied and increased in the land,” declares the LORD, “they will no longer say, ? ![]() ![]() Here it says that there is no longer a physical box called Ark of the Covenant. Then we find John in Revelation 1. Ark descending from heaven. Is there a contradiction, or is it a mystery? I finally found the Ark, Mary is to be called “blessed throughout all generations” (Luke 1: 4. It was at that moment when my serious quest to finding the Ark of the Covenant began. I asked myself, Passover, is a Jewish practice in which God told Israel should be to “you a memorial; and you shall keep it as a feast to the LORD throughout your generations. You shall keep it as a feast by an everlasting ordinance.” (Exodus 1. We still put blood on the door posts and lintels in Bethlehem, a throwback from ancient Israel. Tuesday, Jul 26, 2016: 7:30PM; Wednesday, Jul 27, 2016: 7:30PM; Thursday, Jul 28, 2016: 7:30PM; Friday, Jul 29, 2016: 7:30PM; Saturday, Jul 30, 2016: 2:00PM. Through the years I’ve heard a lot of excuses from pastors and teachers who don’t want to address the Second Coming of Christ. Many of them say it’s just too. Call 2016 many things, but on the entertainment front, be sure you recognize it as the year Andrew Garfield helped bring Christian characters back to the mainstream. The Celluloid Closet; The Surprising Reason Why 2016’s Ben-Hur Isn’t Gay. ![]()
Jews still celebrate Passover now and forever. For Jews to stop this practice means that God lied, and the Jews are no more. It is impossible to stop such an ordinance proclaimed by God. The same was for Mary, but such practice is only done by the Orthodox and the Catholic who call Mary “blessed” throughout all generations. And no, it does not mean that they just “consider” her blessed, it is what it says, “to call” and proclaim audibly Mary as “blessed”, forever. Mary was the key to unlock the riddle of the Ark of the Covenant. Billy Graham said it at least a half a dozen times over the years: “We evangelical Christians do not give Mary her proper due.” He was right. I have hated Billy for working with Catholics, but I was wrong on this one. For all who object perhaps they can name a woman since the creation greater than the blessed Mary, the mother of all the faithful who Elizabeth heard the greeting of Mary said: “why is this granted to me, that the mother of my Lord ? And in Matthew 2. Christ be with us but only stop until the end of the world: “Lo, I am with you always, even to (until) the end of the world”? And in Deuteronomy 3. Moses was buried in a valley in the land of Moab, but no one knows his grave to (until) this day” means that they only knew the burial of Moses the day they jotted these words? Obviously the use of the word in these passages does not imply that Michal had a child after her death, that Christ will depart at the end of the world, or that Moses’ burial place was discovered the day Deuteronomy 3. By the same token, the word . Such a teaching is found nowhere in Scripture and is contrary to the consistent voice of the entire early Church. But before you object, perhaps someone could show us an early Church interpretation where it was taught that Joseph and Mary had a sexual union? Then we have the great accusation that the Catholic intentionally twisted Scripture in Genesis 3: 1. I will put enmities between thee and the woman, and thy seed and her seed: she shall crush thy head, and thou shalt lie in wait for her heel.”They say that Mary crushing the head of the serpent was all intended to institute the worship of Mary. To reply to this dilemma, I always go to my example regarding who crushed the head of Goliath: was it God, David, the stone, or all of the above? And to all I challenge: Will Jesus or will the Church or both crush Satan’s head?“The God of peace will soon crush Satan under your feet.” (Romans 1. Christ but also includes the Church through the Messiah as understood by Calvin and others (2) Zechariah 1. Christ on the battle of Armageddon to end the Antichrist as it says “and all the saints with You”. It was after all, both who were struck by the devil, Christ and Mary when the Holy Spirit through Simeon in Luke 2: 2. Behold, this child is set for the fall and rising of many in Israel, and for a sign that is spoken against and a sword will pierce through your own soul also, that thoughts out of many hearts may be revealed”. Was Mary simply a sinning incubator to house the Holy God and was she only affected by Christ’s crucifixion just like any other sinner, or was she in a way an Ark that housed God? These are mysteries that no man can fully fathom. And why not pick on some Protestant translations, which uses “it” (the seed) instead of “He” that strikes the serpent’s head? But God forbid, accusations only go one way. The use of “it” is correct as well since it addresses several who are involved in crushing the devil. Mt 2. 5: 1, Eph 5: 2. Rv 2. 1: 9- 1. 0). Mary is the Church’s figure, which is an extension of Christ and is His body, which, is also a participant in the act of destroying the devil. It is always, Christ who is God’s right hand and we are the glove so if the hand moved so does the glove. The primary purpose for Christ’s coming was not only to save sinners and my mission in life as a Christian was not some archeologist hunting for a lost ark, but as John stated: “For this purpose the Son of God was manifested, that he might destroy the works of the devil.”And if someone wants to insist on undermining works, how can one destroy works without works and how can Christ destroy the devil without His body—the Church cooperating with Him? Are we not also His body (Matthew 2. His bride (Revelation 1. While the “He” is accurate, Jerome using “she” simply followed the Hebrew text in his edition of the Vulgate (also see Tertullian, 2. A. D.) It is easy to technically err since the subject of the verse had shifted from the woman to the seed of the woman and no one accuses several Protestant translations that the use “it” (King James Version) of forgery. Falsely accusing stems from the spirit of the accuser. There is also an artistic sense in which the Hebrew word for “he” could be copied as feminine, and that is in the case of poetry, which the Jewish Encyclopedia sometimes uses masculine and feminine interchangeably, as it is in my native ancient Arabic; all poetry and song never use the feminine for addressing a female love but use “Habibi” the masculine and is used to one speaking to his female love. What probably should end all arguments regarding the blessed mother of us all is that Scripture starts in Genesis 3: 1. Ark in Revelation 1. In eastern composition, one usually should end with what started in the beginning: Genesis 3: 1. Satan with Christ/Mary/The Church (Israel both adopted and literal) are seen stomping over the crescent of Islam, heylel (Isaiah 1. Lucifer/Hilal, literally crescent) which is the main theme of Revelation 1. Mother of Christ, the man- child and the crescent “moon under her feet”. Here, it’s the woman; “her feet”, not “His feet”. So why are we all harping over this issue? And I could already hear it: The woman in Revelation 1. ONLY about “ISRAEL,” “ISRAEl,” “ISRAEL,” Walid. I could already hear the screaming. Can someone tell us then, why in Revelation 1. God and bear testimony to Jesus”? Is that . We restrict so many themes to only history, we allegorize where there is no allegory and literalize were there are no literal and we ignore where there are allegories which speaks of multiple literals. Verse 9 in between also calls the dragon “that ancient serpent,” tying it even further with Genesis 3: 1. The woman in this passage is Mary because she brings forth the one to rule all nations. And like ancient Israel fleeing through the “wilderness” to Egypt, Mary also fled to Egypt with Joseph (Mt 2: 1. In turn, Israel is the prefigurement of the Church of the new covenant (e. Jer 3. 1: 3. 1- 3. And coming full circle, Mary can be seen to strike the serpent’s head in her role as figure of the Church. But indeed, it is also of Israel the nation which labored to bring forth the Messiah and is invaded by the dragon who is the beast, the devil and Antichrist. There is a “woman” who “labored” in “child birth”. Here we find the literal and the metaphor mingling in a way that the Almighty was hitting several birds with one stone. Indeed, it is also of Israel, which labored and is born after two millennia (see Hosea 6), but John in Revelation 1. Seeing the plural fulfillments is enriching. And what’s with the Ark in Revelation 1. While the apostle John was exiled on the island of Patmos, he wrote something that would have shocked any first- century Jew as I discussing Mary being the lost Ark shocks current Evangelicals today. The ark of the Old Covenant had been lost for centuries—no one had seen it for about 6. But here is the KEY to unlock the vision. In Revelation 1. 1: 1. John makes a surprising announcement: “Then God’s temple in heaven was opened, and the ark of his covenant was seen within his temple.”At this point chapter 1. But the Bible was not written with chapter divisions—they were added in the 1. When John penned these words, there was no division between chapters 1. What did John say immediately after seeing the Ark of the Covenant in heaven? Lets take a look: “And a great portent appeared in heaven, a woman clothed with the sun, with the moon under her feet, and on her head a crown of twelve stars; she was with child” (Revelation 1. The woman is Mary, and here she is the Ark of the Covenant, revealed by God to John. Indeed, the Ark had multiple meanings as well. But here it’s strictly speaking of Mary. She was seen bearing the child who would rule the world with a rod of iron (Revelation 1. Mary was seen as “the ark” and as “a queen” in heaven. Roman salute - Wikipedia. The Roman salute (Italian: saluto romano) is a gesture in which the arm is held out forward straight, with palm down, and fingers touching. In some versions, the arm is raised upward at an angle; in others, it is held out parallel to the ground. In contemporary times, the former is widely considered a symbol of fascism that is commonly perceived to be based on a custom in ancient Rome. The gesture and its identification with Roman culture were further developed in other neoclassic artworks. This was further elaborated upon in popular culture during the late 1. Roman custom. These included a 1. Italianfilm called Cabiria based upon a screenplay by the nationalist poet Gabriele d'Annunzio. In 1. 91. 9, d'Annunzio adopted the cinematographically depicted salute as a neo- imperial ritual when he led the occupation of. Fiume. Through d'Annunzio's influence, the gesture soon became part of the rising Italian Fascist movement's symbolic repertoire. In 1. 92. 3 the salute was gradually adopted by the Italian Fascist regime. It was then adopted and made compulsory within the Nazi party in 1. German state when the Nazis took power in 1. It was also adopted by other fascist movements. Since World War II, the Nazi variant has been a criminal offence in Germany and Austria. Legal restrictions on its use in Italy are more nuanced, and use there has generated controversy. Onlookers raise their arms to acclaim the emperor. The modern gesture consists of stiffly extending the right arm frontally and raising it roughly 1. He swore his oath with the words: . The fingers of the three with bent arms are pointed downward. None of the Romans are returning their gesture. None of the 1. 5 legionaries is raising his entire arm. An officer facing Trajan has his arm close to his body, the lower arm raised, his index finger pointing up, and the other fingers closed. Behind him, two right hands are raised with fingers spread wide. Trajan himself holds his upper right hand close to his body, extending only the lower arm. Unlike modern custom, in which both the leader and the people he addresses raise their arms, most of these scenes show only the senior official raising his hand. It may be extended to the left within the limits of the shoulder, but beyond that it is not fitting. He has both hands raised. The succession of arms raised progressively higher leads to a gesture closely approximating the style used by fascists in the 2. Italy, albeit with the . The fraternal intimacy brought about by the Horatii's dedication to absolute principles of victory or death .. In the total commitment or blind obedience of a single, exclusive group lies the potentiality of the authoritarian state. In the Tennis Court Oath (1. National Assembly are all depicted with their arms outstretched, united in an upward gesture comparable to that of the Horatii, as they swear to create a new constitution.! Morituri te salutant (Hail, Caesar, those who are about to die salute you) of 1. The inventor of the saluting gesture was James B. Upham, junior partner and editor of The Youth's Companion. Roosevelt instituted the hand- over- the- heart gesture as the salute to be rendered by civilians during the Pledge of Allegiance and the national anthem in the United States, instead of the Bellamy salute. De. Mille's Sign of the Cross (1. Cleopatra (1. 93. He further extolled the salute as . By 1. 93. 2, the salute was adopted as the substitute for the handshake. Its use in France dates back to 1. Jeunesses Patriotes (Patriotic Youth), a movement led by Pierre Taittinger, would give the fascist salute at meetings while shouting . The Brazilian form of the Salute was called . These lyrics remained part of the Spanish national anthem until 1. Famed poet Ezra Pound used the salute in praise of his adopted country of Italy when he returned in 1. America.! Lazio fans, first in a match against archrivals A. S. Roma (a team widely supported by Rome's Jewish population. Livorno Calcio (a club inclined to leftist politics). And why should I have made a public display of such a despicable gesture shortly after I've been made a minister? Section 8. 6a of the German Penal Code provides for punishment of up to three years in prison for anyone using the salute, unless it is used for artistic, scientific, or educational purposes. Golden Dawn is accused by its opponents of being neo- Nazi, but the party denies this and claims that the salute is ancient Greek or Roman, and that it is used as a tribute to Ioannis Metaxas and his 4th of August Regime which led Greece against the foreign occupation forces in WWII. It is used by supporters and fighters of Hezbollah, Hamas, Fatah. Often these allegations are raised at the expense of the opposing groups, pro- Assad sympathizers alleging Nazi sympathies of the Opposition and vice versa. It is used by some Rangers F. C. Its similarity to the Nazi salute has caused offence and the football club and its supporters' association have requested fans to stop using it. Not until Gladiator did the Roman epic return to the cinema. For example, The Christian Falangist Party, founded in 1. Since the historicity of the salute has never been properly questioned, performing it is prosecutable only when . Georges, Ausf. 2 v.- -Deutsch- lateinischer theil 1. Berlin 2. 00. 7) , s. Lewis- Short s. v. Att. 1. 6. 1. 5. 3. Quamquam enim . 1. Winkler (2. 00. 8), p. Coarelli, Filippo; Paul Zanker; Bruno Brizzi; Cinzia Conti; Roberto Meneghini; Deutsches Arch. Filippo Coarelli, ed. The Column of Trajan (Translated by Cynthia Rockwell ed.). ISBN 9. 78- 8. 8- 8. Winkler (2. 00. 9), pp. Probably as an acclamatio; note palm is perpendicular to the ground and thumb is sticking up cf. Graham Sumner, Roman military clothing: 1. BC – AD 2. 00, Oxford 2. G3 (Diogmitoi ! Polykleitos, the Doryphoros, and tradition. Wisconsin studies in classics (illustrated ed.). Univ of Wisconsin Press. ISBN 9. 78- 0- 2. Boime, Albert (1. Art in an age of revolution, 1. Social history of modern art. University of Chicago Press. ISBN 9. 78- 0- 2. Rediscovering history: culture, politics, and the psyche. Stanford University Press. ISBN 9. 78- 0- 8. Thomas (2. 00. 6). Operatic migrations: transforming works and crossing boundaries (illustrated ed.). Ashgate Publishing, Ltd. ISBN 9. 78- 0- 7. Parker (1. 99. 0), p. Winkler (2. 00. 9), p. Boime, Albert (1. Art in an age of Bonapartism, 1. Social history of modern art. University of Chicago Press. Suetonius, De Vita Caesarum: Divus Claudius, 2. Baker, Alan (2. 00. The gladiator: the secret history of Rome's warrior slaves. Ebury Press. ISBN 9. Spectacles of death in ancient Rome. ISBN 9. 78- 0- 4. Twenty Three Words: A Biography of Francis Bellamy: Author of the Pledge of Allegiance. Natl Bellamy Award. ISBN 9. 78- 0- 6. Retrieved June 1. Taking on the Pledge of Allegiance: the news media and Michael Newdow's Constitutional challenge. ISBN 9. 78- 0- 7. Flag: An. American Biography. ISBN 0- 3. 12- 3. The Russians Are Coming! The Russians Are Coming!: Pageantry and Patriotism in Cold- War America. New York: Oxford University Press (USA). ISBN 0- 1. 9- 5. 13. Winkler (2. 00. 9), p. Winkler (2. 00. 9), p. Winkler (2. 00. 9), p. Winkler, Martin. 2. APA Annual Meeting. The American Philological Association (APA) (January 8, 2. Leeden (2. 00. 1), p. Solomon, Jon (2. 00. The ancient world in the cinema (2, revised, illustrated ed.). Yale University Press. ISBN 9. 78- 0- 3. Italian cinema. Berg Publishers. ISBN 9. 78- 1- 8. The History of Italian Cinema: A Guide to Italian Film from Its Origins to the Twenty- First Century. Princeton University Press. ISBN 9. 78- 0- 6. Falasca- Zamponi (2. Leeden (2. 00. 1), p. The Anatomy of Fascism. Vintage Series (reprint ed.). Random House, Inc. ISBN 9. 78- 1- 4. The New York Times. Retrieved March 1, 2. Falasca- Zamponi (2. Falasca- Zamponi. Gunther, John (1. Inside Europe. Harper & Brothers. Tilman (2. 00. 9), p. Kershaw (2. 00. 1), p. Tilman (2. 00. 9), pp. Tilman (2. 00. 9), p. Soucy (1. 99. 7), p. Soucy (1. 99. 7), p. Soucy (1. 99. 7), p. Soucy (1. 99. 7), p. Soucy (1. 99. 7), p. The Radical Right in Interwar Estonia - Andres Kasekamp - Google Boeken. Books. google. com. Retrieved 2. 01. 2- 0. A history of fascism, 1. ISBN 9. 78- 1- 8. The Montreal Gazette. April 2. 7, 1. 93. Retrieved February 1. Retrieved 2. 01. 6- 0. A short history of the Yugoslav peoples (2, illustrated ed.). Cambridge University Press. ISBN 9. 78- 0- 5. Yugoslavia: a concise history (illustrated ed.). Palgrave Macmillan. ISBN 9. 78- 0- 3. The Routledge companion to Central and Eastern Europe since 1. Routledge companions to history. ISBN 9. 78- 0- 2. Journal of Contemporary History. Sage Publications. ISSN 0. 02. 2- 0. JSTOR 2. 59. 88. 1. OCLC 4. 99. 76. 30. Retrieved April 1. Extreme right activists in Europe: through the magnifying glass. ISBN 9. 78- 0- 4. The New York Times. July 1. 0, 1. 95. Retrieved March 1, 2. The New York Times. April 2. 7, 1. 96. Retrieved March 1. Montreal Gazette. Retrieved March 1. Montreal Gazette. July 3. 0, 1. 98. Retrieved March 1. The New York Times. Retrieved March 1. Where have all the fascists gone? Ashgate Publishing, Ltd.. ISBN 9. 78- 0- 7. European football in black and white: tackling racism in football. Rowman & Littlefield. ISBN 9. 78- 0- 7. The Daily Mirror; London (UK). Retrieved February 2. Retrieved February 1. Retrieved February 1. The Guardian. Retrieved March 1. Retrieved 2. 01. 3- 0. April 2. 01. 2. 2. October 2. 01. 2. Retrieved 2. 01. 3- 0. Retrieved 2. 01. 3- 0. Keeptalkinggreece. Retrieved 2. 01. 3- 0. Lebanese Army. 2. February 2. 00. 7. Herald Scotland. 2. October 2. 01. 3. Winkler (2. 00. 9), p. Winkler (2. 00. 9), p. Winkler (2. 00. 9), p. Winkler (2. 00. 9), p. Winkler (2. 00. 9), p. Winkler (2. 00. 9), p. Winkler (2. 00. 9), p. Winkler (2. 00. 9), p. Winkler (2. 00. 9), p. References. The Hitler Salute: On the Meaning of a Gesture (Picador ed.). ISBN 9. 78- 0- 3. Falasca- Zamponi, Simonetta (2. Fascist spectacle: the aesthetics of power in Mussolini's Italy. Studies on the history of society and culture. University of California Press. ISBN 9. 78- 0- 5. Kershaw, Ian (2. 00.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. Archives
March 2018
Categories |